What can you actually do next?#
For our community, knowledge is not the end of the process.
Knowledge is the first step. Action is the second.
After learning about Targeted Individuals, V2K, RNM, directed energy, behavioral control, sleep interference, organized harassment, neurotechnology, MKUltra, evidence, and human rights, the next question is practical:
What do we do with what we know?
The answer depends on who you are.
A Targeted Individual needs to document and preserve.
A journalist needs to investigate.
A researcher needs to test.
A human-rights organization needs to create an intake and protection pathway.
An attorney needs to examine evidence and rights.
A government official needs to demand records, oversight, and accountability.
TARGETED.ARMY is designed to help connect those groups around the same record.
Our platform materials describe the mission directly: help Targeted Individuals document experiences, organize evidence, research V2K and RNM, protect their rights, and take lawful action.
This page is where learning becomes action.
If you are a Targeted Individual, where should you begin?#
Begin with your own record.
You do not need to prove the entire system.
You do not need to know the program name.
You do not need to identify every operator.
You do not need to become an RF engineer, neuroscientist, attorney, investigative journalist, or intelligence expert overnight.
Start with what happened to you.
What did you experience?
When?
Where?
What happened immediately before it?
What happened afterward?
Was anyone else present?
Is there a photograph, recording, screenshot, file, medical record, device log, measurement, email, letter, or witness connected to it?
That is where the evidence begins.
Our corpus recommends dated contemporaneous records covering experiences, symptoms, sleep, locations, devices, witnesses, and objective measurements, while preserving original files and metadata.
Build a chronology#
A chronology is one of the most valuable things a Targeted Individual can create.
Do not rely on years of memories stored only in your head.
Turn them into a timeline.
Start with major events:
When did you first notice something unusual?
When did V2K begin?
When did physical effects begin?
When did sleep disruption begin?
When did organized harassment begin?
Did something significant happen beforehand?
Did you change jobs?
File a complaint?
Expose misconduct?
Publish something?
Develop an invention?
Contact an agency?
Begin advocacy?
Move somewhere?
Then begin recording new events as they happen.
Over time, the timeline becomes the backbone of your case.
What should an incident record contain?#
Keep it simple enough that you will actually use it.
A strong incident record should capture:
Date and time
Location
What you directly observed
What you experienced physically or cognitively
What happened immediately before
What happened immediately afterward
People present
Witnesses
Devices involved
Photos, audio, video, screenshots, or files
Technical measurements, if any
Related V2K, RNM, sleep, stalking, or physical events
Actions you took afterward
Then create a separate field for:
What I believe caused this
That separation is useful.
Our legal documentation framework specifically recommends recording what happened, when, where, who was present, what evidence exists, and preserving the distinction between observations and conclusions.
Why separate what happened from what you believe caused it?#
Because both belong in your record, but they answer different questions.
For example:
Observed: "At 3:12 a.m. I woke with intense pressure on the left side of my head. It lasted approximately 90 seconds. A high-pitched tone occurred at the same time."
Interpretation: "I believe this was a directed-energy event."
You are not giving up your interpretation.
You are making the evidence easier for someone else to examine.
An investigator can now ask:
Was anything recorded?
Did it happen on other nights?
Were there physiological changes?
Was there an RF anomaly?
Did V2K occur?
Did changing location affect it?
That creates an investigative path.
Preserve the original evidence#
Do not repeatedly modify the only copy of an important file.
Keep originals.
If you photograph something, preserve the original photograph.
If you record audio or video, preserve the original recording.
If you receive an email, keep the original email and headers.
If an account generates a security alert, preserve it.
If a device produces measurement data, keep the raw data when possible.
If you make an edited version for presentation, keep that separate from the original.
Our rights materials identify useful records including contemporaneous logs, original photographs and video, medical records, technical reports, device logs, communications, witness statements, incident reports, government-record responses, expert reports, court filings, and digital files with metadata.
Back up everything#
One copy is not enough.
Keep multiple copies of important material.
A working copy.
A backup.
And, where practical, another copy stored separately.
If your entire case exists only on one laptop and that laptop fails, years of documentation can disappear.
TARGETED.ARMY's evidence guidance specifically calls for preservation of original files, metadata, and secure backups.
Your evidence should be able to survive:
a broken computer,
a lost phone,
an accidental deletion,
an account lockout,
or years of time.
Organize evidence by incident, not just by file type#
A folder containing 8,000 random images is difficult for anyone to investigate.
Instead, connect evidence to events.
For example:
Incident 2026-08-18-001
Incident report Photos Video Audio Screenshot Medical record RF measurement Witness note Related email Follow-up action
Then the investigator can understand the event as a unit.
This is one reason TARGETED.ARMY's tools are designed around records, timelines, connected evidence, files, and maps rather than simply acting as storage.
Use the Evidence Tracker#
TARGETED.ARMY's Evidence Tracker is intended to turn experiences into an organized chronology.
The site's current tool description includes:
incident records,
original evidence files,
voice notes,
RF or EMF measurements,
calendar views,
reports,
and controlled exports.
That means your record does not have to remain scattered across notebooks, phones, screenshots, cloud folders, and text files.
The objective is one organized case history.
Event → evidence → timeline → pattern.
Use My Story#
Not every person begins with organized evidence.
Sometimes you simply need to explain what happened.
TARGETED.ARMY's My Story system is designed to let members build a private organized account using voice or text, dates, connected evidence, timeline views, and portable exports.
This is particularly useful when your experience spans years.
You can begin with the story you remember.
Then connect documents as you find them.
Your story becomes more structured over time.
Build investigation maps#
Some cases are easier to understand visually.
A map can connect:
people,
events,
locations,
programs,
documents,
companies,
patents,
agencies,
contractors,
dates,
and evidence.
TARGETED.ARMY's visual investigation maps are designed to arrange evidence, notes, files, people, programs, timelines, and relationships into boards that can be saved and exported.
This is especially useful when several apparently unrelated events begin connecting through:
the same organization,
the same person,
the same contractor,
the same date,
the same technology,
or the same location.
A long paragraph can hide relationships.
A map can expose them.
Preserve medical and physical records#
If an event produces physical symptoms or injury, preserve the medical record.
Dates are especially valuable.
A Targeted Individual may later need to establish:
what happened,
when it happened,
what symptoms were recorded,
what tests were performed,
and whether patterns recur.
Our Community Intelligence material emphasizes preserving medical documentation alongside journals and other evidence because it creates an external record of the physical effects being reported.
Do not assume a medical record has to explain the entire mechanism to be useful.
A record showing that a physical event occurred at a particular time can matter later.
Document sleep#
Sleep patterns can become evidence.
Record:
bedtime,
wake time,
unexpected awakenings,
V2K during sleep,
physical events,
dream interference,
tones,
pressure,
pain,
movement,
and fatigue after waking.
If a device records sleep information, preserve the underlying data when possible.
TARGETED.ARMY's planned content specifically includes synthetic insomnia and REM-deprivation logs as structured evidence categories.
One unusual night may mean little.
Thirty nights showing recurring timing may reveal something worth investigating.
Document digital interference#
Digital systems often leave records.
Preserve:
account alerts,
login histories,
password-reset notifications,
emails,
message headers,
device logs,
screenshots,
unexpected settings changes,
security notifications,
and copies of unusual files.
When possible, capture exact dates and times.
The goal is to move from:
"Something happened to my account."
to:
"At this exact time, this system recorded this event."
That is something another person can examine.
What should you do with RF or EMF measurements?#
Treat measurements like technical evidence.
Record:
the device used,
settings,
time,
location,
frequency range,
what was happening at the moment,
and what a normal baseline looks like.
Keep raw data when available.
Do not keep only a screenshot if the instrument can export a recording or data file.
TARGETED.ARMY's Evidence Tracker explicitly anticipates RF and EMF measurements as part of organized incident records.
Technical evidence becomes much stronger when another qualified person can examine exactly how it was collected.
Look for patterns#
Individual events matter.
Patterns matter more.
Once you have enough records, begin asking:
Does targeting intensify at particular times?
Does it change by location?
Does sleep interference happen on a schedule?
Does V2K precede physical effects?
Do certain actions trigger recurring responses?
Does public advocacy correlate with increased harassment?
Does travel change anything?
Do certain devices or environments correlate with events?
Do the same people, vehicles, phrases, or locations recur?
Your records should eventually allow you to search these questions instead of trying to remember the answers.
Do not try to investigate everything at once#
There are hundreds of subjects in the TARGETED.ARMY Knowledge Set.
You do not need to master them all.
Choose the areas most relevant to your experience.
If you experience voices, begin with V2K & Synthetic Telepathy.
If something appears to respond to unspoken thought, study RNM.
If you experience unexplained physical effects, study Directed Energy.
If you experience repeated environmental harassment, study Organized Stalking.
If your concern is historical continuity, study MKUltra and Government Programs.
If you want technical sources, study Evidence, Research & Patents.
If you need the rights framework, study Mind Sovereignty & Human Rights.
Then move deeper.
TARGETED.ARMY's public research structure already separates archives, evidence-preservation material, movement activity, research, and rights so users can follow the path relevant to them.
Use Community Intelligence#
Your case is not the only source of information.
TARGETED.ARMY's Community Intelligence system exists so hundreds of questions and answers can be searched and compared across topics.
A Targeted Individual can use it to ask:
Has anyone documented this term?
What technologies are associated with this experience?
What patents should I examine?
What historical programs are relevant?
What rights questions apply?
What other concepts should I research?
The Research pathway in the site's design specifically directs users to Community Intelligence for organized questions, research, and source-linked topics.
This is where an AI engine grounded specifically in the TARGETED.ARMY Knowledge Set can become extremely useful.
Instead of searching the entire internet from scratch, the visitor can interrogate the knowledge our community has already organized.
Use AI as a research assistant, not as the evidence itself#
A community-grounded AI can help you:
find terminology,
locate relevant documents,
compare concepts,
identify patents,
summarize historical programs,
find related questions,
organize timelines,
draft research questions,
and identify gaps in your evidence.
But if an AI says a document exists, follow it to the document.
If it identifies a patent, open the patent.
If it identifies a government program, locate the government record.
The AI should help you find the evidence.
It should not replace the evidence.
File FOIA and public-record requests#
The Freedom of Information Act can be used to request federal agency records.
State and local agencies have their own public-record procedures.
Our legal framework describes FOIA as one lawful path for requesting government records and notes that agencies can invoke statutory exemptions, with administrative or judicial review available in appropriate circumstances.
TARGETED.ARMY's FOIA Generator is designed to help members prepare focused requests with:
agency guidance,
clear descriptions of records,
date ranges,
and filing-ready language.
The goal should be specific records.
Not:
"Give me everything about mind control."
Ask:
"Provide records responsive to this program name, office, contractor, date range, technology, incident, or identifiable person."
Specific requests are easier to process and appeal.
Build a government paper trail#
Even when a request produces a denial or limited response, the correspondence itself becomes part of the record.
Preserve:
the original request,
tracking number,
agency acknowledgment,
response,
redactions,
exemption claims,
appeal,
and final disposition.
Your timeline now includes:
I formally requested this information on this date.
That can later matter to attorneys, journalists, Congress, or investigators.
Submit Inspector General complaints when appropriate#
Federal departments and intelligence agencies have Inspectors General responsible for receiving complaints concerning misconduct, abuse, fraud, waste, and violations of policy or law.
Our rights material recommends that a strong complaint identify the agency or program, conduct, dates, responsible officials when known, supporting records, applicable rules, and the specific action being requested.
Do not simply send your entire archive without explanation.
Build the complaint around a clear issue.
What happened?
What evidence supports it?
What authority should review it?
What do you want them to do?
Contact Congress#
Congress has oversight power.
Relevant committees can conduct hearings, request records, issue subpoenas under their procedures, review classified programs, examine appropriations, and require agencies to answer questions.
Our legal materials identify intelligence, judiciary, armed services, appropriations, homeland-security, and government-oversight committees among possible congressional channels depending on the issue.
TARGETED.ARMY's government pathway is already structured around:
reviewing historical records,
opening the Congressional Dossier,
and using the Congress Action Center to contact oversight offices.
The objective is not simply to send anger to Congress.
Give them something they can act on.
A record.
A question.
A document.
A preservation request.
A proposed hearing.
A specific agency.
A specific program.
A specific contractor.
Use the Writer and outreach tools#
TARGETED.ARMY includes writing and outreach tools intended to convert evidence into professional communications.
The Writer provides guided templates for officials, agencies, Congress, journalists, organizations, and other audiences.
The Civic Email Outreach Center organizes recipients, templates, review, delivery, and follow-up.
Your documentation should not stay permanently locked in a private folder.
At the appropriate point, it should become:
a complaint,
a records request,
a journalist briefing,
a human-rights submission,
a congressional request,
or a legal record.
What should journalists do?#
If you are a journalist, your next step is not simply to decide whether you agree with us.
Open the investigation.
Our Journalist Dossier is explicitly designed as a reporting roadmap covering:
community reports,
technical research,
historical records,
case patterns,
evidence preservation,
records and custodians,
patents,
contractor trails,
rights,
and verification sources.
Start with one case.
Build its chronology.
Interview the person in depth.
Preserve their original evidence.
Identify which parts can be independently verified.
Then follow the records.
Journalists should request documents#
The community is asking journalists to pursue the things individual citizens often cannot obtain.
Contracts.
Procurement.
Program-transition records.
Tasking records.
Technical specifications.
Human-subject protocols.
Inspector General reports.
Agency correspondence.
Equipment records.
Contractor relationships.
Legal authorities.
Declassification records.
Our investigative materials repeatedly emphasize following the research, contractors, records, agencies, and missing documentation rather than simply reporting claims.
Journalists should investigate people and institutions#
Technologies have histories.
Programs have people.
Contracts have names.
Patents have inventors.
Research has laboratories.
Follow them.
Who moved from one program to another?
Who received the grants?
Who owned the patents?
Which company acquired the technology?
Which government office had transition authority?
Where did the researchers go next?
A technology trail can sometimes tell a story that a program name cannot.
What should researchers and scientists do?#
Our community needs independent research.
Not merely arguments.
Design testable protocols.
Take the experience being reported and ask:
What would we expect to observe if this mechanism were present?
What instruments would be required?
What controls are needed?
What baseline should be collected?
What could produce a false positive?
Can the measurement be reproduced?
Can another laboratory independently analyze the data?
The Researcher pathway already frames the job correctly: use patents, public records, testimony, and the community archive to identify what can be verified, measured, reproduced, or ruled out.
That is the investigation our community needs.
What should human-rights organizations do?#
Treat this as an intake and protection problem.
People are reporting:
non-consensual surveillance,
bodily interference,
coercion,
sleep disruption,
privacy violations,
technological harassment,
and lack of meaningful remedy.
A human-rights organization can:
accept testimony,
preserve evidence,
identify patterns across cases,
seek government responses,
refer technical material for independent review,
raise neural privacy and informed consent,
submit urgent communications,
and advocate for neurorights.
The Human Rights pathway on TARGETED.ARMY is already structured around reviewing the human-rights record, reading the community appeal, and requesting direct supporting documentation.
Our community is not asking only to be heard.
We are asking for a process.
What should governments do?#
Preserve the records first.
That is critical.
If there is a genuine investigation, records cannot be allowed to disappear while agencies debate jurisdiction.
Our materials call for preservation covering agencies, military components, intelligence elements, laboratories, contractors, technology vendors, administrative records, technical records, legal records, tasking, telemetry, access logs, communications, training, procurement, backups, and deletion logs.
The MKUltra record-destruction history makes preservation an immediate issue.
Preserve first. Investigate second.
Governments should audit across agencies#
Do not examine each technology in isolation.
A meaningful investigation should ask whether capabilities intersect across:
NSA,
CIA,
DoD,
DARPA,
military laboratories,
contractors,
telecommunications providers,
research universities,
and other entities.
The community's policy materials call for cross-agency review of research, testing, deployment, legal authorities, contractors, incident reports, and safeguards involving U.S. persons.
One office may hold only one piece.
The investigation has to connect them.
What should attorneys do?#
Begin with the evidence.
Legal action requires more than a broad allegation.
Our legal framework says a responsible record should separate:
what was experienced,
what can independently be observed,
what technical or medical records show,
what documents establish,
what remains uncertain,
which actors can be identified,
and what legal rule may apply.
Then determine:
what cause of action exists,
which defendants can be sued,
what jurisdiction applies,
what deadlines exist,
what immunities may apply,
whether administrative remedies must be exhausted,
and what evidence is sufficient.
The materials explicitly identify those as issues qualified counsel may need to evaluate.
The strongest litigation begins with the strongest record.
What should whistleblowers do?#
Preserve what you lawfully can.
Document:
program names,
offices,
contractors,
dates,
locations,
systems,
authorities,
and people.
Be precise.
One verifiable internal detail may be worth more than a hundred broad statements.
Journalists and investigators need information that can lead to:
records,
witnesses,
contracts,
facilities,
or technical systems.
A whistleblower can provide the missing bridge between a public technology and an operational program.
Should people work alone?#
No major investigation should depend permanently on one person carrying everything.
TARGETED.ARMY's member network is designed to allow members to exchange research and resources and organize lawful community action inside a protected environment.
Someone may be good at patents.
Someone else understands FOIA.
Another person knows RF measurement.
Another is good at research.
Another knows congressional procedure.
Another can organize timelines.
Another can write.
This is why a community matters.
One person does not have to become everything.
Protect your privacy while building the record#
Evidence does not have to mean publishing your entire life publicly.
Control what you share.
Keep private records private until there is a reason to disclose them.
Remove unnecessary personal information when distributing public copies.
Use controlled sharing.
Maintain originals separately.
TARGETED.ARMY's platform design specifically includes protected evidence storage, account privacy controls, and controlled exports because documentation and public disclosure are not the same thing.
You should decide who needs what.
A journalist may need one set of records.
An attorney may need another.
A public post may need far less.
Turn documentation into a case package#
Eventually, your case should be understandable by someone who has never met you.
A useful package might contain:
One-page summary
Who you are, what you report, when it began, and what you are asking for.
Chronology
Major events in date order.
Evidence index
Every file assigned to an event.
Key documents
The most important records first.
Witnesses
Names and what they can independently confirm.
Technical evidence
Measurements and methodology.
Medical or physical records
Relevant documentation.
Government correspondence
FOIA, complaints, referrals, and responses.
Research connections
Relevant patents, programs, and public records.
Open questions
What still needs investigation.
This makes it possible for another person to enter the case without spending a month decoding your folders.
Build a dossier for the audience#
Not every audience needs the same document.
A journalist needs:
the story,
chronology,
evidence,
public records,
contacts,
and unresolved questions.
A human-rights organization needs:
the violations,
testimony,
patterns,
rights framework,
and requested intervention.
A government office needs:
specific allegations,
records,
jurisdiction,
questions,
and action requested.
A researcher needs:
observations,
measurements,
methodology,
raw data,
and testable hypotheses.
TARGETED.ARMY already follows this model with separate Journalist, Human Rights, Congressional/International, and Public materials.
That is exactly how the action layer of the site should work.
Do not just send information—ask for an action#
Every outreach should answer:
What do we want this person to do?
For a journalist:
Investigate this story.
For a researcher:
Review this evidence or design an independent protocol.
For a human-rights organization:
Open an inquiry.
For Congress:
Request records and conduct oversight.
For an attorney:
Review the evidence and legal issues.
For an agency:
Preserve records and respond to specific questions.
TARGETED.ARMY's pathway design already follows this approach, giving each role different calls to action rather than sending everyone to the same generic information.
This is how the third part of the site becomes useful.
Measure responses#
Action itself should be documented.
If you write Congress:
record the office,
date,
message,
case number,
response,
and follow-up.
If you file FOIA:
record the tracking number and disposition.
If a journalist contacts you:
record the publication and reporter.
If an agency refers your complaint:
record where it went.
If a human-rights organization opens a case:
preserve the identifier.
Our platform model explicitly calls for breaking issues into lawful assignments, giving members evidence standards and templates, tracking completed actions, and measuring responses.
That creates something our community has lacked for too long:
institutional memory.
Preserve agency denials too#
A denial is still a record.
An unanswered letter is still part of the chronology.
A referral is a record.
A FOIA exemption is a record.
A statement that an office has "no responsive records" is a record.
Over time, agency responses can be compared.
What did one agency say?
What did another say?
Did the answers change?
Did Congress receive a different answer?
Did later declassification contradict an earlier response?
Do not discard the responses you dislike.
Preserve everything.
Keep building the public record#
The larger mission of TARGETED.ARMY is not simply helping individual people keep private journals.
It is building a durable public record.
Our Journalist Dossier states the principle clearly: preserve the evidence, interview affected individuals, verify public records, seek missing documents, test technically where possible, and leave a transparent trail that future investigators can continue.
That is bigger than one case.
Individual records become community evidence.
Community evidence creates investigative leads.
Investigative leads create public records.
Public records create oversight.
Oversight can create accountability.
What does peaceful action look like?#
Our movement's strength is in:
documentation,
research,
journalism,
law,
public records,
congressional oversight,
human-rights advocacy,
public education,
and organized lawful action.
TARGETED.ARMY's platform model describes action as selecting accountable institutions, breaking issues into understandable assignments, giving members templates and evidence standards, allowing participation according to privacy and ability, and building sustained peaceful pressure and a public record.
We are building evidence.
We are asking questions.
We are demanding records.
We are petitioning government.
We are contacting journalists.
We are pursuing lawful remedies.
We are organizing.
We are documenting history while it is happening.
What should a new visitor do today?#
If you are reading this because you believe you are experiencing targeting, begin with three things.
Create your story.
Write down what happened and when.
Create your first evidence record.
Attach whatever evidence belongs to it.
Begin your timeline.
Do not try to finish everything today.
The objective is to create a system that can grow with you.
Tomorrow's evidence should have somewhere to go.
Next month's records should connect to the same chronology.
Years from now, another investigator should be able to understand what happened.
What should someone who wants to help do today?#
Choose your role.
If you are a journalist, investigate a case.
If you are a researcher, help design a test.
If you are an attorney, review evidence and rights.
If you work in human rights, help create a credible intake pathway.
If you are a government official, request records and oversight.
If you are a supporter, help preserve research, educate others, distribute documented materials, and connect the community with people capable of acting.
Not everyone needs to perform the same job.
What matters is that the work connects.
What is TARGETED.ARMY ultimately building?#
A bridge.
Between experience and evidence.
Between evidence and investigation.
Between investigation and journalism.
Between testimony and human rights.
Between technology and law.
Between isolated Targeted Individuals and a community capable of preserving what happened.
Between unanswered questions and institutions with the power to answer them.
The tools are part of that bridge.
The Knowledge Center is part of that bridge.
The dossiers are part of that bridge.
Community Intelligence is part of that bridge.
The evidence archive is part of that bridge.
The movement is part of that bridge.
What should you understand after all twelve pages?#
You now have the larger framework.
1. Targeted Individuals Who we are and what we experience.
2. V2K & Synthetic Telepathy How communication can appear to enter the mind.
3. Remote Neural Monitoring How mental activity can appear to be monitored.
4. Mind & Behavior Control How surveillance and stimulation can become a feedback system.
5. Directed Energy Weapons How energy can produce physical and neurological effects.
6. Sleep, Dreams & the Body How targeting can reach rest, dreams, memory, and bodily autonomy.
7. Electronic Harassment & Organized Stalking How the target's surrounding environment can become part of the pressure.
8. Neurotechnology & Artificial Intelligence How modern interfaces and AI can potentially connect the different capabilities.
9. MKUltra to Modern Programs The historical record behind government behavior-control, surveillance, and human experimentation.
10. Evidence, Research & Patents How we build the technical and documentary record.
11. Human Rights, Cognitive Liberty & Mind Sovereignty The rights at stake.
12. Documentation, Protection & Action What we do next.
These twelve pages are not the end of TARGETED.ARMY's knowledge.
They are the map.
From here, the visitor can go deeper into hundreds of questions, dossiers, patents, articles, archives, research, tools, and community records.
But now they understand the territory.
And most importantly, they understand that they do not have to remain only a witness to what is happening.
They can create a record.
They can preserve evidence.
They can research.
They can ask questions.
They can contact institutions.
They can demand accountability.
They can help another person document.
They can contribute to the public record.
Learn the system.
Document the experience.
Preserve the evidence.
Know your rights.
Take lawful action.
Build the record that cannot be erased.