HUMAN RIGHTS BRIEF / 01
Learn the language used by the Targeted Individual community, then consider the protections implicated by reports involving the body, nervous system, private thought, consent, and technological coercion.
START HERE
Before an institution can respond, it must understand the language being used by the people asking for help. These are central issues reported throughout the Targeted Individual community.
Remote Neural Monitoring is the term our community uses for the remote observation, analysis, decoding, or interaction with neural activity and cognitive processes.
Targeted Individuals describe an invasion that reaches beyond ordinary surveillance.
As neural technology advances, protections for mental privacy, cognitive liberty, neural data, and freedom of thought cannot remain theoretical.
Does the right to privacy end at the skull?Explore Human Rights Content
Voice-to-Skull describes the perception of speech, sounds, threats, commands, or other communications without a conventional external acoustic source.
Members of our community report persistent involuntary experiences they associate with V2K and synthetic telepathy. These reports raise questions involving psychological coercion, freedom of thought, privacy, dignity, informed consent, and protection from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.
Explore Human Rights ContentTargeted Individuals report localized pain, heating, sleep disruption, neurological effects, fatigue, and other physical experiences they associate with directed radio-frequency, microwave, millimeter-wave, acoustic, or related energy.
Directed-energy technologies already occupy a real field of military and scientific research.
The human-rights question is whether existing institutions are prepared to receive, document, technically evaluate, and investigate civilian complaints involving these technologies.
Explore Human Rights ContentElectronic harassment is the broader term our community uses for technologically mediated interference affecting an individual’s body, communications, privacy, environment, work, relationships, or daily life.
Reports can include surveillance, electronic interference, intimidation, sleep disruption, communication problems, technological manipulation, and other sustained forms of pressure.
When complaints involve unfamiliar technologies, there still must be a path to documentation, evidence preservation, independent review, and remedy.
Explore Human Rights ContentMany Targeted Individuals describe repetitive experiences they believe resemble long-term experimentation involving neurological effects, behavioral responses, sleep, sensory states, or adaptive technological systems.
The history of human-rights law repeatedly demonstrates why safeguards surrounding experimentation must be enforced before abuse occurs—not only after it is exposed.
Human experimentation requires informed consent.Explore Human Rights Content
Targeted Individuals come from many professions, backgrounds, nations, and circumstances. Our community includes ordinary civilians, inventors, researchers, activists, journalists, former government personnel, whistleblowers, and others who describe persistent technological intrusion or harassment.
For years, many have struggled to find institutions capable of even receiving these complaints in a structured way. We are asking the human-rights community to help build that pathway.
Explore Human Rights ContentTHE HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS
Some of the most important rights of the twenty-first century may involve territory humanity has never previously needed to regulate: the human mind itself.
Mental privacy asks whether the inner life of a person—including neural activity and information derived from it—should be protected from unauthorized observation, collection, analysis, disclosure, or interference.
HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTION / ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEWReview six concrete actions, four program concepts, dossier contents, and ways to receive testimony or collaborate with TARGETED.ARMY.